Monday, July 30, 2012

P&G...Impacting Taicang, China...

Proctor and Gamble, or P&G to most of us, has one of their newest factories in Taicang China. This facility is designed to:
  • Minimize water consumption while maximizing water re-use by recovering steam condensate for domestic water needs and harvesting rainwater to replenish on-site landscaping water.
Funny story though... told to me by a senior member of P&G's Sustainability Team... It seems that the Taicang facility takes in water from the river for use in process and manufacturing, and as part of their corporate goals they have been told to use less water and to recycle it, after treatment, back to the river so that there is near zero impact on the environment.

The Facilities Team at Taicang have complained...they don't know why they should use less water. You see P&G cleans the water taken in before they use it, then they treat it before they put it back in the river. In fact the water that they put back into the river is cleaner than the water drawn in for use in production processes, and because they reclaim it in their processes before treatment and recycling...they put back almost as much as they use, but the water that they put back is cleaner than the river water and therefore they don't understand why they should use less. The insiders think they are helping the environment by using and returning the P&G process water...

Hard to argue...GO P&G!

Are the Terms Sustainability and Environmentalism Interchangable?

Interesting question... we keep hearing Sustainability as a current "Buzz Word"... everyone is trying to be sustainable... but is it all about the Environment?

So tell me... If you are a company like ...oh, say Walt Disney Company...who makes a great deal of its profits from 'retail sales' with all of the cardboard and plastic packaging and the ...thousands of miles of shipboard and eighteen wheeler transportation ...shipments from producers in China and Indonesia and other sites worldwide, going to places like the US or France and Japan... but you support the movie production of "The Earth" or "Oceans" or most recently "Chimpanzees", all in your environmental genera... are you really undertaking a Sustainable, ethical conscious path?

Environmentalism is not necessarily Sustainability in action. Saving trees in the US on either side of our Interstate Highways...yet clear cutting in the heart of the forest...NOT SUSTAINABLE! And ignoring the elimination of the Ancient Rain Forests in the under developed world (Indonesia, Brazil, Africa...) ...HEY....O2 comes from Trees...CO2 is taken in by them. Basic Science, even if our Science classes are failing. Sustainability calls on us finding a solution that works, one that is equitable for the citizens of all nations…not just developed nations.

Sustainability is about Environment.... but it is also about Economics and Equity (generation after generation) and it is worldwide, not just sun-lights on Walmarts...Sustainability means saving water in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East...oh, and in North America too; its about Cleaning the air in India; ensuring food will grow where we need it...for an ever increasing world population...9+ Billion by 2050. But it is also about jobs and the ability to secure a meaningful life…now and into the future…for all of us.

Or what about our Federal Agencies...like the Council on Environmental Quality...some heavy hitters who work for the Executive Branch...are they about Sustainability? Recently I asked them what they thought the definition was for Sustainability, and as of today I am still waiting for an answer. Their web presence shows they are about the Environment, but no real discussion about a plan for a Sustainable future...

Before we award anymore Trophies to the Koch Brothers or, Disney, BASF, Camargo Correa in Brazil, or the Power Companies the world over… we need to look at what they are doing to ensure Earth's Sustainable Future. Water preservation...but also aquifer management, Reduced production generated air particulate...but also cleaner air through localized chemical applications of their products, Reduced use of Coal... but also increased investment into alternative energy sourcing...of all types, not just Natural Gas…and we need to do it now...not when we can't fix the problems our increasing Carbon Footprint is causing.

No, Environmentalism is not Sustainability…not by half… and Sustainability, with its three pillars, is what we need.

Friday, July 27, 2012

Research....Not for the Detail-Challenged!

Recently while working on a NSF Grant funded project, looking at systems destroyed by natural disaster and the impact tragedies like earthquakes and tornadoes have on the environment, I found myself thinking about just how important research is. You see, numbers by themselves…number hurt, wind speed, dollars of damage…are only facts. They don’t yield solutions that help us to establish strategies and procedures that we can use in future disaster response efforts…that takes research to gather all the facts and then analysis that finds the trends, the causes, and the threats which provide the tools we need for the future.

Research counts!

Thursday, July 26, 2012

What's Up With Coal?

In 2005 between 50 and 60% of electricity produced in the United States was generated by burning coal; today about 500 power plants use coal nationally to produce about 35% of our electricity. These plants continue to be the leading cause of smog, acid rain, and air toxics in our country and worldwide where an even higher percentage of power plants use coal.
How bad is the pollution released by a coal burning plant? Well in an average year, a typical coal plant generates:
  
  • 3,700,000 tons of carbon dioxide (CO2), the primary human cause of global warming--as much carbon dioxide as cutting down 161 million trees.
  • 10,000 tons of sulfur dioxide (SO2), which causes acid rain that damages forests, lakes, and buildings, and forms small airborne particles that can penetrate deep into lungs.
  • 500 tons of small airborne particles, which can cause chronic bronchitis, aggravated asthma, and premature death, as well as haze obstructing visibility.
  • 10,200 tons of nitrogen oxide (NOx), as much as would be emitted by half a million late-model cars. NOx leads to formation of ozone (smog) which inflames the lungs, burning through lung tissue making people more susceptible to respiratory illness.
  • 720 tons of carbon monoxide (CO), which causes headaches and place additional stress on people with heart disease.
  • 220 tons of hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds (VOC), which form ozone.
  • 170 pounds of mercury, where just 1/70th of a teaspoon deposited on a 25-acre lake can make the fish unsafe to eat.
  • 225 pounds of arsenic, which will cause cancer in one out of 100 people who drink water containing 50 parts per billion.
  • 114 pounds of lead, 4 pounds of cadmium, other toxic heavy metals, and trace amounts of uranium.
The Clean Air Act, not withstanding, Big Coal has hardly conceded defeat in this multifront war between a safe environment and the economic impact of regulations (both which impact us all).
The industry has increased political campaign contributions in the last four years to historic levels, with 80 percent of those annual donations going to Republicans…or $4,039,018.00 as compared to $800,000.00 to Democrats in 2011, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Companies like Arch Coal, which used to spend only about $100,000 a year on lobbyists in Washington, invested $5.7 million to push its case during the first three years of the Obama administration.
And even as American Electric Power plans to close 5 of its 21 coal-burning plants and rely much more on natural gas, it still intends to retrofit 12 plants. That means it will be burning coal for years to come. A rise in natural gas prices could also slow the decline of coal as a power source. So the company has joined with old allies in Washington to try to delay the new rules and block any future ones.
The industry and its supporters have also gone to court, filing lawsuits challenging E.P.A. rules that limit pollution from coal-burning plants from crossing state lines and the mountaintop mining rules that are holding up new permits in Kentucky and West Virginia — legal fights that the industry has had some success with so far.

If you care about this issue ...either side...you need to be speaking with your State and Federal representatives...voice your opinion to make a difference.

Friday, July 6, 2012

Katherine Gajewski, a Greenworks example...

It was my pleasure today to spend some time talking with Katherine Gajewski, Director of the Mayor’s Office on Sustainability for the City of Philadelphia.

This was a pleasure for me because Director Gajewski is leading Philadelphia to a very effective future by engaging sustainability and its five pillars, as they like to view it, of energy, environment, equity, economy, and engagement. If every city, large...medium...or small, were to take up action similar to the cost saving actions initiated by Philadelphia in their Greenworks Philadelphia program I am confident that we would meet our future national goals and then exceed them...all ahead of schedule.

Director Gajewski, thanks for the time...and I look forward to watching where you take your city in the future.

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Sustainable Retail and MFG Suppliers

There is a growing community of Retail and Product Manufacturers who are striving to improve their Sustainable Profile through reduced carbon footprints and improved Supply Chain Management...Here are those selected by a body of Sustainability Experts in their 2011 Survey.

These results equate to Millions of Tons of reduced Carbon...sustainability on the move!

Monday, July 2, 2012

Time after time...Pipelines Leak!

Pipelines leak…and poor operations and failures to correct degraded systems makes it worse.

Federal regulators proposed a $3.7 million civil penalty Monday against the Canadian owner of a pipeline that ruptured in 2010, dumping more than 800 million gallons of oil into a southwestern Michigan river.
Michigan Pipeline Spill-2010

The U.S. Department of Transportation's Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration said the penalty against Enbridge Inc. would be the largest it has imposed. In a letter to the company, the agency listed 24 violations of hazardous liquid pipeline regulations, including failure to fix corrosion problems in the damaged pipe joint discovered as far back as 2004.

It took more than 17 hours to realize that the pipe line had ruptured…and during that time an additional 678000 gallons were dumped into the Kalamazoo River… finally detecting the breach after trying to restart the pipeline twice creating surges that made the disaster worse, even though there were numerous alarms and indications that there was a serious leak in progress.

It is this type of leak that has caused the Federal Government to delay the decision process on current pipeline requests.